Pain impairs consolidation, but not acquisition or retrieval of a declarative memory.

Among the physical conditions that impair memory performance, pain is one of the most prevalent. However, the mechanisms by which pain impairs memory are largely unknown. In this study, we asked whether pain affects memory acquisition, consolidation and retrieval as well as whether memory impairment depends on pain intensity. Wistar rats received a hind paw injection of formalin (1%) at different phases of object recognition test. The injection of formalin after training but not before training or testing impaired object recognition memory. We concluded that pain impairs the consolidation but not acquisition or retrieval of object recognition memory, which is a subtype of declarative memory. Morphine, at a dose that did not affect object recognition memory in control rats, drastically reduced formalin-induced nociceptive behavior without reversing memory impairment. A lower dose of formalin (0.25%) induced less nociceptive behavior, but similar memory impairment. There is no statistical correlation between the intensity of nociceptive response and the performance in object recognition test. However, when formalin-induced nociceptive response was blocked by a local anesthetic, memory impairment was prevented. These findings suggest that pain-induced impairment in the consolidation of object recognition memory does not directly depend on the intensity of nociceptive activity.

Pain and stress: functional evidence that supra-spinal mechanisms involved in pain-induced analgesia mediate stress-induced analgesia.

Analgesia induced by stressful and painful stimuli is an adaptive response during life-threatening situations. There is no evidence linking the mechanisms underlying them, while the former depends on the activation of stress-related brain pathways, the second depends on opioidergic mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens and on nicotinic cholinergic mechanisms in the rostral ventromedial medulla. In this study, we hypothesized that stress-induced analgesia is also dependent on opioidergic mechanisms in the nucleus accumbens and on nicotinic cholinergic mechanisms in the rostral ventromedial medulla. We used immobilization, a classical procedure to induce acute stress, and evaluated its ability to decrease the nociceptive responses induced either by carrageenan or by formalin in rats. Immobilization stress significantly decreased either carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia or formalin-induced tonic nociception in a time-dependent manner. This stress-induced analgesia is similar to pain-induced analgesia, as revealed by contrasting the antinociceptive effect induced by immobilization and by a forepaw injection of capsaicin. The administration of a µ-opioid receptor antagonist (CTOP, 0.5 µg) into the nucleus accumbens, as well as that of a nicotinic cholinergic receptor antagonist (mecamylamine, 0.6 µg) into the rostral ventromedial medulla, blocked immobilization stress-induced analgesia in both pain models. These results demonstrate that supraspinal mechanisms which are known to mediate pain-induced analgesia also mediate stress-induced analgesia. Therefore both forms of analgesia have overlapping mechanisms, probably recruited in response to the perception of danger.

Chronic sleep restriction increases pain sensitivity over time in a periaqueductal gray and nucleus accumbens dependent manner.

Painful conditions and sleep disturbances are major public health problems worldwide and one directly affects the other. Sleep loss increases pain prevalence and severity; while pain disturbs sleep. However, the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. Here we asked whether chronic sleep restriction for 6 h daily progressively increases pain sensitivity and if this increase is reversed after two days of free sleep. Also, whether the pronociceptive effect of chronic sleep restriction depends on the periaqueductal grey and on the nucleus accumbens, two key regions involved in the modulation of pain and sleep-wake cycle. We showed that sleep restriction induces a pronociceptive effect characterized by a significant decrease in the mechanical paw withdrawal threshold in rats. Such effect increases progressively from day 3 to day 12 remaining stable thereafter until day 26. Two consecutive days of free sleep were not enough to reverse the effect, not even to attenuate it. This pronociceptive effect depends on the periaqueductal grey and on the nucleus accumbens, since it was prevented by their excitotoxic lesion. Complementarily, chronic sleep restriction significantly increased c-Fos protein expression within the periaqueductal grey and the nucleus accumbens and this correlates with the intensity of the pronociceptive effect, suggesting that the greater the neural activity in this regions, the greater the effect. These findings may contribute not only to understand why painful conditions are more prevalent and severe among people who sleep poorly, but also to develop therapeutic strategies to prevent this, increasing the effectiveness of pain management in this population.

Dopaminergic mechanisms in periaqueductal gray-mediated antinociception.

As important as perceiving pain is the ability to modulate this perception in some contextual salient situations. The periaqueductal gray (PAG) is perhaps the most important site of endogenous pain modulation; however, little is known about dopaminergic mechanisms underlying PAG-mediated antinociception. In this study, we used a pharmacological approach to evaluate this subject. We found that µ-opioid receptor-induced antinociception (DAMGO, 0.3 µg) from PAG was blocked by the coadministration of either D1-like or D2-like dopaminergic antagonists (SCH23390, 2, 4, and 6 µg or raclopride, 2 and 4 µg, respectively) both in the tail-flick and in the mechanical paw-withdrawal test. A selective D2-like receptor agonist (piribedil, 6 and 12 µg into the PAG) induced antinociception in the mechanical paw-withdrawal test, but not in the tail-flick test. This effect was blocked by the coadministration of its selective antagonist (raclopride 4 µg), as well as by either a GABAA agonist (muscimol, 0.1 µg) or an opioid receptor antagonist (naloxone, 0.5 µg). A selective D1-like receptor agonist (SKF38393, 1, 5, and 10 µg into the PAG) induced a poor and transient antinociceptive effect, but when combined with piribedil, a potentiated antinociceptive effect emerged. None of these treatments affected locomotion in the open-field test. These findings suggest that µ-opioid antinociception from the PAG depends on dopamine acting on both D1-like and D2-like receptors. Selective activation of PAG D2-like receptors induces antinociception mediated by supraspinal mechanisms dependent on inhibition of GABAA and activation of opioid neurotransmission.